Keycloak vs SuperTokens
Compare Keycloak and SuperTokens side by side across authentication methods, user management, compliance, security, and developer integration features.
Keycloak supports 67 of 110 tracked features, SuperTokens supports 53.
Feature Comparison
- 🇺🇸US🇪🇺EU🇸🇪🇱🇫🇭🇴🇸🇹🇪🇩Self-hosted
- AWSAzureGCPAWSAzureGCPOn-premises
- JavaScriptTypeScriptReactReact NativeNext.jsNode.jsPythonGoJava.NETSwiftKotlinFlutter
Looking for a different comparison? See the full (C)IAM Identity Providers benchmark.
More Keycloak comparisons
Keycloak vs Ping IdentityKeycloak vs DescopeKeycloak vs OktaKeycloak vs FusionAuthKeycloak vs OryKeycloak vs CurityKeycloak vs CyberArk IdentityKeycloak vs Auth0Keycloak vs Microsoft Entra External IDKeycloak vs Amazon CognitoKeycloak vs KindeKeycloak vs ZitadelKeycloak vs StytchKeycloak vs FronteggKeycloak vs ClerkKeycloak vs GluuKeycloak vs WorkOSKeycloak vs SailPoint Identity Security CloudKeycloak vs Firebase AuthenticationKeycloak vs Supabase AuthKeycloak vs Duende IdentityServerKeycloak vs AutheliaKeycloak vs Authlete
More SuperTokens comparisons
SuperTokens vs Ping IdentitySuperTokens vs DescopeSuperTokens vs OktaSuperTokens vs FusionAuthSuperTokens vs OrySuperTokens vs CuritySuperTokens vs CyberArk IdentitySuperTokens vs Auth0SuperTokens vs Microsoft Entra External IDSuperTokens vs Amazon CognitoSuperTokens vs KindeSuperTokens vs ZitadelSuperTokens vs StytchSuperTokens vs FronteggSuperTokens vs ClerkSuperTokens vs GluuSuperTokens vs WorkOSSuperTokens vs SailPoint Identity Security CloudSuperTokens vs Firebase AuthenticationSuperTokens vs Supabase AuthSuperTokens vs Duende IdentityServerSuperTokens vs AutheliaSuperTokens vs Authlete
Note: The current data is based on provider documentation/experience and may not be 100% accurate. Please open an issue if you have spotted any inconsistencies.